| |
Book Information
Samson Agonistes
is the climax and completion of Milton's poetic vision. As such,
it has become the work at which the critical controversies in Milton
studies converge and from which new critical perspectives on Milton's
poems emerge. In 1969, John Carey heralded the birth of new critical
perspectives when he contended that Milton's dramatic poem "is not
a drama of inner regeneration," a view that flies in the face of
traditional interpretation, which tends to perceive Samson as a
hero of regeneration. Carey also focused on Samson's "tragic
sulk" and the "theatre-demolition" at the feast of Dagon. Following
Carey's lead, other critics, notably Irene Samuel, began to question
the various elements, large and small, of the traditional interpretation
of Milton's dramatic poem. Milton's religious and political thinking,
his use of prosody and verse, his outlook on tragedy, and the like
were all reexamined.
Since this revisionist view of Samson Agonistes
began to develop, it has unfolded with a decisiveness and momentum
that now challenge the traditional view, if not overthrow it. The
dramatic poem's ambiguities highlight Milton's innovative adaptation
of the biblical narrative concerning Samson, undermine the traditional
ideas of Samson's election by God and his redemption, question the
typological alignment of the Hebraic and Christian scriptures whereby
Samson traditionally is perceived as a "hero of faith" who prefigures
the mission and ministry of Jesus, and draw attention to Milton's
use of Arminianism, Calvinism, and other theological views.
This book contends that there are several Samsons
in the dramatic poem and multiple contexts and various traditions
that bring to light Milton's unique rendition of a kaleidoscopic
protagonist. To achieve its purposes, this book forges and deploys
a new critical vocabulary of paramount importance not only to Miltonists
but to critical theorists generally.
|